Art
J-GLOBAL ID:202002289286267439   Reference number:20A1233440

Deficit Model, One-Way Communication, and Two-Way Communication: Reassembling Key Concepts in Science Communication

欠如モデル・一方向コミュニケーション・双方向コミュニケーション 科学技術コミュニケーションにおける中核概念の再配置
Author (2):
Material:
Issue: 18  Page: 208-220  Publication year: Apr. 30, 2020 
JST Material Number: L7777A  ISSN: 1347-5843  Document type: Article
Article type: 原著論文  Country of issue: Japan (JPN)  Language: JAPANESE (JA)
Thesaurus term:
Thesaurus term/Semi thesaurus term
Keywords indexed to the article.
All keywords is available on JDreamIII(charged).
On J-GLOBAL, this item will be available after more than half a year after the record posted. In addtion, medical articles require to login to MyJ-GLOBAL.

Semi thesaurus term:
Thesaurus term/Semi thesaurus term
Keywords indexed to the article.
All keywords is available on JDreamIII(charged).
On J-GLOBAL, this item will be available after more than half a year after the record posted. In addtion, medical articles require to login to MyJ-GLOBAL.

JST classification (1):
JST classification
Category name(code) classified by JST.
Policy,system and organizations for science and technology 
Reference (25):
  • Bauer, M. W. 2016:“ Results of the essay competition on the‘ deficit conception’”, Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 398-9.
  • Borchelt, R. E. 2008:“ Public relations in science: managing the trust portfolio”, Bucchi, M. and Trench, B.(eds.), Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, Routledge, 147-57.
  • Brossard, D. and Lewenstein, B. V. 2010: “A Critical Appraisal of Models of Public Understanding of Science Using Practice to Inform Theory”, Kahlor, L.-A. and Stout, P.(eds.), Communicating Science-New Agendas in Communication, Routledge, 11-39.
  • Bucchi, M. 2008:“ Of deficits, deviation and dialogue: theories of public communication of science”, Bucchi, M. and Trench, B.(eds.), Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, Routledge, 57-76.
  • Bucchi, M. and Neresini, F. 2002:“ Biotech remains unloved by the more informed”, Nature, 416, 212.
more...

Return to Previous Page